Filling out the DA Form 638 can be a straightforward process, yet many individuals make common mistakes that can delay the approval of awards. One frequent error occurs in the name section. People often forget to include the full name, including the middle initial. Omitting the middle initial can lead to confusion, especially if there are multiple individuals with similar names. Always ensure that the name is written correctly and completely.
Another mistake is related to the Social Security Number (SSN). Some applicants may leave this field blank or provide an incorrect number. This information is crucial for identifying the service member and processing the award. Double-checking the SSN against official documents can prevent unnecessary delays.
Additionally, the reason for the award is sometimes inadequately detailed. Simply stating "good service" does not provide enough context. Specific examples of achievements or acts of valor should be included. This clarity helps the reviewing authority understand the significance of the award being recommended.
Many individuals also overlook the period of award section. Failing to specify the correct dates can result in complications. It is essential to provide accurate start and end dates for the service being recognized. This ensures that the award reflects the appropriate timeframe of the achievements.
Furthermore, some applicants neglect to sign the form. A signature is necessary to validate the recommendation. Without it, the form may be returned for correction, causing delays in the award process. Always remember to sign and date the form before submission.
Another common oversight involves the justification and citation data section. Applicants may provide vague descriptions instead of specific bullet points detailing meritorious acts. This section should clearly outline the accomplishments that warrant recognition, allowing reviewers to appreciate the award's significance.
Inaccuracies in the recommended award section can also hinder processing. Sometimes, individuals mistakenly recommend the wrong type of award. It is vital to consult the guidelines to ensure the correct award is being requested based on the achievements documented.
Moreover, the interim award checkbox is often mismanaged. Some applicants may forget to indicate whether the award is interim or posthumous. This information is crucial for the processing authority to understand the context of the award being recommended.
Lastly, failing to include the presentation date can lead to confusion. If an award is time-sensitive, it is important to specify when it should be presented. This helps in planning the ceremony and ensuring that all parties involved are informed.